Papers › Global-Reasoned Multi-Task Learning Model for Surgical Scene Understanding

Global-Reasoned Multi-Task Learning Model for Surgical Scene Understanding

28 Jan 2022arXiv:2201.11957archive 2025-07-28

Lalithkumar Seenivasan, Sai Mitheran, Mobarakol Islam, Hongliang Ren

Global and local relational reasoning enable scene understanding models to perform human-like scene analysis and understanding. Scene understanding enables better semantic segmentation and object-to-object interaction detection. In the medical domain, a robust surgical scene understanding model allows the automation of surgical skill evaluation, real-time monitoring of surgeon's performance and post-surgical analysis. This paper introduces a globally-reasoned multi-task surgical scene understanding model capable of performing instrument segmentation and tool-tissue interaction detection. Here, we incorporate global relational reasoning in the latent interaction space and introduce multi-scale local (neighborhood) reasoning in the coordinate space to improve segmentation. Utilizing the multi-task model setup, the performance of the visual-semantic graph attention network in interaction detection is further enhanced through global reasoning. The global interaction space features from the segmentation module are introduced into the graph network, allowing it to detect interactions based on both node-to-node and global interaction reasoning. Our model reduces the computation cost compared to running two independent single-task models by sharing common modules, which is indispensable for practical applications. Using a sequential optimization technique, the proposed multi-task model outperforms other state-of-the-art single-task models on the MICCAI endoscopic vision challenge 2018 dataset. Additionally, we also observe the performance of the multi-task model when trained using the knowledge distillation technique. The official code implementation is made available in GitHub.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2201.11957")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 8 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: 8 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

lalithjets/global-reasoned-multi-task-model officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
7unverified

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_checkpoint_loc identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 671e094a50427ee5 · report
evaluation identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 89a1d6919a0782a9 · report
index_to_label identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · adfe1b8c93c47410 · report
label_to_index identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · a9972e7fa15180e1 · report
loss_fn identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 94bf8cb7d4647820 · report
seg_eval_batch identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 00ac121ef6b76c5e · report
seg_eval_batch identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · c8ae217d2e04133d · report
weighted_loss identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 365bded1dd42d919 · report

Tasks

Graph AttentionKnowledge DistillationMulti-Task LearningRelational ReasoningScene UnderstandingSegmentationSemantic Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Knowledge Distillation

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections