Papers › Geometry-Aware Gradient Algorithms for Neural Architecture Search
Geometry-Aware Gradient Algorithms for Neural Architecture Search
Liam Li, Mikhail Khodak, Maria-Florina Balcan, Ameet Talwalkar
Recent state-of-the-art methods for neural architecture search (NAS) exploit gradient-based optimization by relaxing the problem into continuous optimization over architectures and shared-weights, a noisy process that remains poorly understood. We argue for the study of single-level empirical risk minimization to understand NAS with weight-sharing, reducing the design of NAS methods to devising optimizers and regularizers that can quickly obtain high-quality solutions to this problem. Invoking the theory of mirror descent, we present a geometry-aware framework that exploits the underlying structure of this optimization to return sparse architectural parameters, leading to simple yet novel algorithms that enjoy fast convergence guarantees and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the latest NAS benchmarks in computer vision. Notably, we exceed the best published results for both CIFAR and ImageNet on both the DARTS search space and NAS-Bench201; on the latter we achieve near-oracle-optimal performance on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Together, our theory and experiments demonstrate a principled way to co-design optimizers and continuous relaxations of discrete NAS search spaces.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2004.07802")
Code
Syntology Ran 12 of 15 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran; found in paper text by Syntology: 10 samples from 2 repositories, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 12 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0ae6d8b3f048531d · report
2b798f4102f93552 · report
35516df482cccb4b · report
e70f49be6527cff9 · report
411c70cf0de59d37 · report
b0d6e9e65ecc665d · report
132f546bb7ef86ba · report
5acfdb2e37fd4c79 · report
c6c6288219c9d532 · report
2b614488c8cb14d3 · report
290cc06f55a8d0ed · report
c585344417dc92cc · report
bc41443a9046202e · report
acb824e0877d8cbd · report
f4c89acbb418f526 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neural Architecture Search | ImageNet | GAEA PC-DARTS | Params | 5.6 | #97 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | ImageNet | GAEA PC-DARTS | Top-1 Error Rate | 24 | #97 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 | GAEA DARTS (ERM) | Accuracy (Test) | 94.1 | #16 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100 | GAEA DARTS (ERM) | Accuracy (Test) | 73.43 | #9 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Neural Architecture Search | NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120 | GAEA DARTS (ERM) | Accuracy (Test) | 46.36 | #10 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections