Papers › GeoCLIP: Clip-Inspired Alignment between Locations and Images for Effective Worldwide...
GeoCLIP: Clip-Inspired Alignment between Locations and Images for Effective Worldwide Geo-localization
Worldwide Geo-localization aims to pinpoint the precise location of images taken anywhere on Earth. This task has considerable challenges due to immense variation in geographic landscapes. The image-to-image retrieval-based approaches fail to solve this problem on a global scale as it is not feasible to construct a large gallery of images covering the entire world. Instead, existing approaches divide the globe into discrete geographic cells, transforming the problem into a classification task. However, their performance is limited by the predefined classes and often results in inaccurate localizations when an image's location significantly deviates from its class center. To overcome these limitations, we propose GeoCLIP, a novel CLIP-inspired Image-to-GPS retrieval approach that enforces alignment between the image and its corresponding GPS locations. GeoCLIP's location encoder models the Earth as a continuous function by employing positional encoding through random Fourier features and constructing a hierarchical representation that captures information at varying resolutions to yield a semantically rich high-dimensional feature suitable to use even beyond geo-localization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work employing GPS encoding for geo-localization. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method via extensive experiments and ablations on benchmark datasets. We achieve competitive performance with just 20% of training data, highlighting its effectiveness even in limited-data settings. Furthermore, we qualitatively demonstrate geo-localization using a text query by leveraging CLIP backbone of our image encoder. The project webpage is available at: https://vicentevivan.github.io/GeoCLIP
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2309.16020")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 13 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran; community (archive-listed): 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
13 samples harvested; 5 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0342fbed5f4dd6e2 · report
10336c7c42408bd3 · report
193ffaf24c16bd61 · report
0420b6ffe30c1b1b · report
59757f850bed5fc9 · report
88bf24771293c9e0 · report
0db29c57e5099ec7 · report
ccb9f7466f37469c · report
ae05a9ade5fb928f · report
7e8b0eadc545633d · report
8f9ebe49ed62b249 · report
80221b8324d17fd9 · report
57f6ab5e0536c43d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPS Embeddings | Geo-Tagged NUS-WIDE (GPS + Visual) | GeoCLIP | mAP | 0.362 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| GPS Embeddings | Geo-Tagged NUS-WIDE (GPS Only) | GeoCLIP | mAP | 0.249 | #1 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | GWS15k | GeoCLIP | City level (25 km) | 3.1 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | GWS15k | GeoCLIP | Continent level (2500 km) | 74.1 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | GWS15k | GeoCLIP | Country level (750 km) | 45.7 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | GWS15k | GeoCLIP | Region level (200 km) | 16.9 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | GWS15k | GeoCLIP | Street level (1 km) | 0.6 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | City level (25 km) | 34.5 | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | Continent level (2500 km) | 83.8 | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | Country level (750 km) | 69.7 | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | Region level (200 km) | 50.7 | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | Street level (1 km) | 14.1 | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | Im2GPS3k | GeoCLIP | Training Images | 4.7M | #3 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | City level (25 km) | 22.2 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | Continent level (2500 km) | 76.0 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | Country level (750 km) | 57.5 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | Region level (200 km) | 36.7 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | Street level (1 km) | 11.6 | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Photo geolocation estimation | YFCC26k | GeoCLIP | Training Images | 4.7M | #1 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections