Papers › Detecting the dimensionality of genuine multi-particle entanglement

Detecting the dimensionality of genuine multi-particle entanglement

9 Feb 2024arXiv:2402.06234links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Gabriele Cobucci, Armin Tavakoli

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Complex forms of quantum entanglement can arise in two qualitatively different ways; either between many qubits or between two particles with higher-than-qubit dimension. While the many-qubit frontier and the high-dimension frontier both are well-established, state-of-the-art quantum technology is becoming increasingly able to create and manipulate entangled states that simltaneously feature many particles and high dimension. Here, we investigate generic states that can be considered both genuinely high-dimensional and genuine multi-particle entangled. We consider a natural quantity that characterises this key property. To detect it, we develop three different classes of criteria. These enable us both to probe the ultimate noise tolerance of this form of entanglement and to make detection schemes using sparse or even minimal measurement resources. The approach provides a simple way of benchmarking entanglement dimensionality in the multi-particle regime and general, platform-independent, detection methods that readily apply to experimental use.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gabrielecobucci/gmen-mixer officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections