Papers › Generic Neural Architecture Search via Regression

Generic Neural Architecture Search via Regression

4 Aug 2021NeurIPS 2021 12arXiv:2108.01899archive 2025-07-28

Yuhong Li, Cong Hao, Pan Li, JinJun Xiong, Deming Chen

Most existing neural architecture search (NAS) algorithms are dedicated to and evaluated by the downstream tasks, e.g., image classification in computer vision. However, extensive experiments have shown that, prominent neural architectures, such as ResNet in computer vision and LSTM in natural language processing, are generally good at extracting patterns from the input data and perform well on different downstream tasks. In this paper, we attempt to answer two fundamental questions related to NAS. (1) Is it necessary to use the performance of specific downstream tasks to evaluate and search for good neural architectures? (2) Can we perform NAS effectively and efficiently while being agnostic to the downstream tasks? To answer these questions, we propose a novel and generic NAS framework, termed Generic NAS (GenNAS). GenNAS does not use task-specific labels but instead adopts regression on a set of manually designed synthetic signal bases for architecture evaluation. Such a self-supervised regression task can effectively evaluate the intrinsic power of an architecture to capture and transform the input signal patterns, and allow more sufficient usage of training samples. Extensive experiments across 13 CNN search spaces and one NLP space demonstrate the remarkable efficiency of GenNAS using regression, in terms of both evaluating the neural architectures (quantified by the ranking correlation Spearman's rho between the approximated performances and the downstream task performances) and the convergence speed for training (within a few seconds).

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2108.01899")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

leeyeehoo/GenNAS officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
leeyeehoo/gennas-zero mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
1ran

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

trainval leeyeehoo/GenNAS/do_search.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 7d546663f09e3a88 · report
trainval leeyeehoo/GenNAS/do_sample.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 0e7eabd6dc7a7d54 · report
BarrierNAS leeyeehoo/gennas-zero/model_wrapper/barrier/barrier_nas.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic no licence file found · pointer only · 3763f6adc18d6582 · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationNeural Architecture Searchimage-classificationregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-101 GenNAS Spearman Correlation 0.87 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 GenNAS Accuracy (Test) 94.18 #15 of 37 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 GenNAS Accuracy (Val) - #15 of 37 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10 GenNAS Search time (s) 1080 #15 of 37 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100 GenNAS Accuracy (Test) 72.56 #16 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100 GenNAS Search time (s) 1080 #16 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120 GenNAS Accuracy (Test) 45.59 #24 of 49 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search NAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120 GenNAS Search time (s) 1080 #24 of 49 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationBottleneck Residual BlockConvolutionGlobal Average PoolingKaiming InitializationLSTMMax PoolingReLUResidual BlockResidual ConnectionSigmoid ActivationTanh Activation

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections