Papers › Generalized Zero- and Few-Shot Learning via Aligned Variational Autoencoders

Generalized Zero- and Few-Shot Learning via Aligned Variational Autoencoders

5 Dec 2018arXiv:1812.01784archive 2025-07-28

Edgar Schönfeld, Sayna Ebrahimi, Samarth Sinha, Trevor Darrell, Zeynep Akata

Many approaches in generalized zero-shot learning rely on cross-modal mapping between the image feature space and the class embedding space. As labeled images are expensive, one direction is to augment the dataset by generating either images or image features. However, the former misses fine-grained details and the latter requires learning a mapping associated with class embeddings. In this work, we take feature generation one step further and propose a model where a shared latent space of image features and class embeddings is learned by modality-specific aligned variational autoencoders. This leaves us with the required discriminative information about the image and classes in the latent features, on which we train a softmax classifier. The key to our approach is that we align the distributions learned from images and from side-information to construct latent features that contain the essential multi-modal information associated with unseen classes. We evaluate our learned latent features on several benchmark datasets, i.e. CUB, SUN, AWA1 and AWA2, and establish a new state of the art on generalized zero-shot as well as on few-shot learning. Moreover, our results on ImageNet with various zero-shot splits show that our latent features generalize well in large-scale settings.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1812.01784")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · violated contract.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

edgarschnfld/CADA-VAE-PyTorch officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
sanixa/CADA-VAE-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · violated contract

Licence: 0 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

map_label edgarschnfld/CADA-VAE-PyTorch/model/data_loader.py official repository ran · violated contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 7ac965f971d0020b · report
str2bool sanixa/CADA-VAE-pytorch/model/single_experiment.py community (archive-listed) ran · violated contract MIT (permissive) · f017532fc389cbfe · report

Tasks

Few-Shot LearningGeneralized Few-Shot LearningGeneralized Zero-Shot LearningZero Shot Skeletal Action RecognitionZero-Shot Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Generalized Few-Shot Learning AwA2 CADA-VAE Per-Class Accuracy (1-shot) 69.6 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Generalized Few-Shot Learning AwA2 CADA-VAE Per-Class Accuracy (10-shots) 80.2 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Generalized Few-Shot Learning AwA2 CADA-VAE Per-Class Accuracy (2-shots) 73.7 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Generalized Few-Shot Learning AwA2 CADA-VAE Per-Class Accuracy (20-shots) 80.9 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Generalized Few-Shot Learning AwA2 CADA-VAE Per-Class Accuracy (5-shots) 78.1 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D CADA-VAE Accuracy (12 unseen classes) 28.96 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D CADA-VAE Accuracy (5 unseen classes) 76.84 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D CADA-VAE Random Split Accuracy 60.74 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D 120 CADA-VAE Accuracy (10 unseen classes) 59.53 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D 120 CADA-VAE Accuracy (24 unseen classes) 35.77 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition NTU RGB+D 120 CADA-VAE Random Split Accuracy 45.14 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero Shot Skeletal Action Recognition PKU-MMD CADA-VAE Random Split Accuracy 60.74 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Softmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections