Papers › General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verification

General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verification

11 Aug 2022arXiv:2208.05740archive 2025-07-28

huan zhang, Shiqi Wang, Kaidi Xu, Linyi Li, Bo Li, Suman Jana, Cho-Jui Hsieh, J. Zico Kolter

Bound propagation methods, when combined with branch and bound, are among the most effective methods to formally verify properties of deep neural networks such as correctness, robustness, and safety. However, existing works cannot handle the general form of cutting plane constraints widely accepted in traditional solvers, which are crucial for strengthening verifiers with tightened convex relaxations. In this paper, we generalize the bound propagation procedure to allow the addition of arbitrary cutting plane constraints, including those involving relaxed integer variables that do not appear in existing bound propagation formulations. Our generalized bound propagation method, GCP-CROWN, opens up the opportunity to apply general cutting plane methods for neural network verification while benefiting from the efficiency and GPU acceleration of bound propagation methods. As a case study, we investigate the use of cutting planes generated by off-the-shelf mixed integer programming (MIP) solver. We find that MIP solvers can generate high-quality cutting planes for strengthening bound-propagation-based verifiers using our new formulation. Since the branching-focused bound propagation procedure and the cutting-plane-focused MIP solver can run in parallel utilizing different types of hardware (GPUs and CPUs), their combination can quickly explore a large number of branches with strong cutting planes, leading to strong verification performance. Experiments demonstrate that our method is the first verifier that can completely solve the oval20 benchmark and verify twice as many instances on the oval21 benchmark compared to the best tool in VNN-COMP 2021, and also noticeably outperforms state-of-the-art verifiers on a wide range of benchmarks. GCP-CROWN is part of the α,β-CROWN verifier, the VNN-COMP 2022 winner. Code is available at http://PaperCode.cc/GCP-CROWN

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2208.05740")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 6 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 6 samples from 2 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

huanzhang12/alpha-beta-CROWN officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report
lemutisme/biccos mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
verified-intelligence/alpha-beta-crown mentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it
1ran
4unverified

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

ConfigHandler avrahamraviv/formal-verification-of-object-detection/complete_verifier/cuts/cut_verification.py community (archive-listed) ran licence not identified · pointer only · 6102b90c8a017444 · report
patches_to_matrix Verified-Intelligence/alpha-beta-CROWN_vnncomp2024/complete_verifier/cuts/optimized_cuts.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it licence not identified · pointer only · 226b29d234506943 · report
Cutter Verified-Intelligence/alpha-beta-CROWN_vnncomp2024/complete_verifier/cuts/optimized_cuts.py community (archive-listed) unverified licence not identified · pointer only · e3423487e852c402 · report
OptimizedCutter Verified-Intelligence/alpha-beta-CROWN_vnncomp2024/complete_verifier/cuts/optimized_cuts.py community (archive-listed) unverified licence not identified · pointer only · fae7acb536120814 · report
Patches Verified-Intelligence/alpha-beta-CROWN_vnncomp2024/complete_verifier/cuts/optimized_cuts.py community (archive-listed) unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 7901579aff6971d9 · report
set_dependencies avrahamraviv/formal-verification-of-object-detection/complete_verifier/cuts/cut_verification.py community (archive-listed) unverified licence not identified · pointer only · 48c660c22563df09 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections