Papers › Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods

Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods

18 Apr 2018NAACL 2018 6arXiv:1804.06876archive 2025-07-28

Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, Kai-Wei Chang

We introduce a new benchmark, WinoBias, for coreference resolution focused on gender bias. Our corpus contains Winograd-schema style sentences with entities corresponding to people referred by their occupation (e.g. the nurse, the doctor, the carpenter). We demonstrate that a rule-based, a feature-rich, and a neural coreference system all link gendered pronouns to pro-stereotypical entities with higher accuracy than anti-stereotypical entities, by an average difference of 21.1 in F1 score. Finally, we demonstrate a data-augmentation approach that, in combination with existing word-embedding debiasing techniques, removes the bias demonstrated by these systems in WinoBias without significantly affecting their performance on existing coreference benchmark datasets. Our dataset and code are available at http://winobias.org.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

mapmeld/disambiguation_q mentioned on GitHub report
txsun1997/metric-fairness mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
uclanlp/corefBias mentioned on GitHubMIT report
vergrig/RuBia-Dataset mentioned on GitHubCC-BY-4.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Coreference ResolutionData Augmentationcoreference-resolution

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

WinoBias

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections