Papers › GEMMbench: a framework for reproducible and collaborative benchmarking of matrix multiplication

GEMMbench: a framework for reproducible and collaborative benchmarking of matrix multiplication

12 Nov 2015arXiv:1511.03742links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Anton Lokhmotov

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The generic matrix-matrix multiplication (GEMM) is arguably the most popular computational kernel of the 20th century. Yet, surprisingly, no common methodology for evaluating GEMM performance has been established over the many decades of using GEMM for comparing architectures, compilers and ninja-class programmers. We introduce GEMMbench, a framework and methodology for evaluating performance of GEMM implementations. GEMMbench is implemented on top of Collective Knowledge (CK), a lightweight framework for reproducible and collaborative R&D in computer systems. Using CK allows the R&D community to crowdsource hand-written and compiler-generated GEMM implementations and to study their performance across multiple platforms, data sizes and data types. Our initial implementation supports hand-written OpenCL kernels operating on matrices consisting of single- and double-precision floating-point values, and producing single or multiple output elements per work-item (via thread coarsening and vectorization).

PaperPDFCode

Code

dividiti/gemmbench officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections