Papers › GASP: Gated Attention For Saliency Prediction
GASP: Gated Attention For Saliency Prediction
Fares Abawi, Tom Weber, Stefan Wermter
Saliency prediction refers to the computational task of modeling overt attention. Social cues greatly influence our attention, consequently altering our eye movements and behavior. To emphasize the efficacy of such features, we present a neural model for integrating social cues and weighting their influences. Our model consists of two stages. During the first stage, we detect two social cues by following gaze, estimating gaze direction, and recognizing affect. These features are then transformed into spatiotemporal maps through image processing operations. The transformed representations are propagated to the second stage (GASP) where we explore various techniques of late fusion for integrating social cues and introduce two sub-networks for directing attention to relevant stimuli. Our experiments indicate that fusion approaches achieve better results for static integration methods, whereas non-fusion approaches for which the influence of each modality is unknown, result in better outcomes when coupled with recurrent models for dynamic saliency prediction. We show that gaze direction and affective representations contribute a prediction to ground-truth correspondence improvement of at least 5% compared to dynamic saliency models without social cues. Furthermore, affective representations improve GASP, supporting the necessity of considering affect-biased attention in predicting saliency.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | AUC-J | 0.810 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | CC | 0.613 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | FPS | 3.77 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | KLDiv | 0.687 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | NSS | 1.57 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Saliency Detection | MSU Video Saliency Prediction | GASP | SIM | 0.557 | #10 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections