Papers › Galaxy Imaging with Generative Models: Insights from a Two-Models Framework
Galaxy Imaging with Generative Models: Insights from a Two-Models Framework
Jean-Eric Campagne
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Generative models have recently revolutionized image generation tasks across diverse domains, including galaxy image synthesis. This study investigates the statistical learning and consistency of three generative models: light-weight-gan (a GAN-based model), Glow (a Normalizing Flow-based model), and a diffusion model based on a U-Net denoiser, all trained on non-overlapping subsets of the SDSS dataset of 64x64 grayscale images. While all models produce visually realistic images with well-preserved morphological variable distributions, we focus on their ability to learn and generalize the underlying data distribution. The diffusion model shows a transition from memorization to generalization as the dataset size increases, confirming previous findings. Smaller datasets lead to overfitting, while larger datasets enable novel sample generation, supported by the denoising process's theoretical basis. For the flow-based model, we propose an "inversion test" leveraging its bijective nature. Similarly, the GAN-based model achieves comparable morphological consistency but lacks bijectivity. We then introduce a "discriminator test", which shows successful learning for larger datasets but poorer confidence with smaller ones. Across all models, dataset sizes below O(100,000) pose challenges to learning. Along our experiments, the "two-models" framework enables robust evaluations, highlighting both the potential and limitations of these models. These findings provide valuable insights into statistical learning in generative modeling, with applications certainly extending beyond galaxy image generation.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections