Papers › Gaia pulsars and where to find them

Gaia pulsars and where to find them

13 Nov 2020arXiv:2011.08075links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

John Antoniadis

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

While the majority of massive stars have a stellar companion, most pulsars appear to be isolated. Taken at face value, this suggests that most massive binaries break apart due to strong natal kicks received in supernova explosions. However, the observed binary fraction can still be subject to strong selection effects, as monitoring of newly discovered pulsars is rarely carried out for long enough to conclusively rule out multiplicity. Here, we use the second Gaia Data Release (DR2) to search for companions to 1534 rotation-powered pulsars with positions known to better than 0.5 arcseconds. We find 22 matches to known pulsars, including one not reported elsewhere, and 8 new possible companions to young pulsars. We examine the photometric and kinematic properties of these systems and provide empirical relations for identifying Gaia sources with potential millisecond pulsar companions. Our results confirm that the observed multiplicity fraction is small. However, we show that the number of binaries below the sensitivity of Gaia and radio timing in our sample could still be significantly higher. We constrain the binary fraction of young pulsars to be f_(young)ᵗʳᵘᵉ≤5.3(8.3)% under realistic(conservative) assumptions for the binary properties and current sensitivity thresholds. For massive stars (≥10 M_⊙) in particular, we find f_(OB)ᵗʳᵘᵉ≤3.7% which sets a firm independent upper limit on the galactic neutron-star merger rate, ≤7.2×10⁻⁴ yr⁻¹. Ongoing and future projects such as the CHIME/pulsar program, MeerTime, HIRAX and ultimately the SKA, will significantly improve these constraints in the future.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections