Papers › Full-stack Comparison of Channel Models for Networks Above 100 GHz in an Indoor Scenario
Full-stack Comparison of Channel Models for Networks Above 100 GHz in an Indoor Scenario
Amir Ashtari Gargari, Michele Polese, Michele Zorzi
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The Sixth Generation (6G) of mobile networks is expected to use carrier frequencies in the spectrum above 100 GHz, to satisfy the demands for higher data rates and bandwidth of future digital applications. The development of networking solutions at such high frequencies is challenged by the harsh propagation environment, and by the need for directional communications and signal processing at high data rates. A fundamental step in defining and developing wireless networks above 100 GHz is given by an accurate performance evaluation. For simulations, this strongly depends on the accuracy of the modeling of the channel and of the interaction with the higher layers of the stack. This paper introduces the implementation of two recently proposed channel models (based on ray tracing and on a fully stochastic model) for the 140 GHz band for the ns-3 TeraSim module, which enables simulation of macro wireless networks in the sub-terahertz and terahertz spectrum. We also compare the two channel models with full-stack simulations in an indoor scenario, highlighting differences and similarities in how they interact with the protocol stack and antenna model of TeraSim.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections