Papers › Full-Resolution Network and Dual-Threshold Iteration for Retinal Vessel and Coronary...
Full-Resolution Network and Dual-Threshold Iteration for Retinal Vessel and Coronary Angiograph Segmentation
Wentao Liu,Huihua Yang, Tong Tian, Zhiwei Cao, Xipeng Pan, Weijin Xu, Yang Jin, Feng Gao
Vessel segmentation is critical for disease diagnosis and surgical planning. Recently, the vessel segmentation method based on deep learning has achieved outstanding performance. However, vessel segmentation remains challenging due to thin vessels with low contrast that easily lose spatial information in the traditional U-shaped segmentation network. To alleviate this problem, we propose a novel and straightforward full-resolution network (FR-UNet) that expands horizontally and vertically through a multiresolution convolution interactive mechanism while retaining full image resolution. In FR-UNet, the feature aggregation module integrates multiscale feature maps from adjacent stages to supplement high-level contextual information. The modified residual blocks continuously learn multiresolution representations to obtain a pixel-level accuracy prediction map. Moreover, we propose the dual-threshold iterative algorithm (DTI) to extract weak vessel pixels for improving vessel connectivity. The proposed method was evaluated on retinal vessel datasets (DRIVE, CHASE\_DB1, and STARE) and coronary angiography datasets (DCA1 and CHUAC). The results demonstrate that FR-UNet outperforms state-of-the-art methods by achieving the highest Sen, AUC, F1, and IOU on most of the above-mentioned datasets with fewer parameters, and that DTI enhances vessel connectivity while greatly improving sensitivity.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | CHASE_DB1 | FR-UNet | AUC | 0.9913 | #4 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | CHASE_DB1 | FR-UNet | F1 score | 0.8151 | #4 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | CHASE_DB1 | FR-UNet | Sensitivity | 0.8798 | #4 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | DRIVE | FR-UNet | AUC | 0.9889 | #2 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | DRIVE | FR-UNet | Accuracy | 0.9705 | #2 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | DRIVE | FR-UNet | F1 score | 0.8316 | #2 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Retinal Vessel Segmentation | DRIVE | FR-UNet | sensitivity | 0.8356 | #2 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections