Papers › Preference-Consistent Knowledge Distillation for Recommender System
Preference-Consistent Knowledge Distillation for Recommender System
Zhangchi Zhu, Wei zhang
Feature-based knowledge distillation has been applied to compress modern recommendation models, usually with projectors that align student (small) recommendation models' dimensions with teacher dimensions. However, existing studies have only focused on making the projected features (i.e., student features after projectors) similar to teacher features, overlooking investigating whether the user preference can be transferred to student features (i.e., student features before projectors) in this manner. In this paper, we find that due to the lack of restrictions on projectors, the process of transferring user preferences will likely be interfered with. We refer to this phenomenon as preference inconsistency. It greatly wastes the power of feature-based knowledge distillation. To mitigate preference inconsistency, we propose PCKD, which consists of two regularization terms for projectors. We also propose a hybrid method that combines the two regularization terms. We focus on items with high preference scores and significantly mitigate preference inconsistency, improving the performance of feature-based knowledge distillation. Extensive experiments on three public datasets and three backbones demonstrate the effectiveness of PCKD. The code of our method is provided in https://github.com/woriazzc/KDs.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections