Papers › From Bag of Sentences to Document: Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction via...
From Bag of Sentences to Document: Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction via Machine Reading Comprehension
Lingyong Yan, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Fangchao Liu, Ning Bian
Distant supervision (DS) is a promising approach for relation extraction but often suffers from the noisy label problem. Traditional DS methods usually represent an entity pair as a bag of sentences and denoise labels using multi-instance learning techniques. The bag-based paradigm, however, fails to leverage the inter-sentence-level and the entity-level evidence for relation extraction, and their denoising algorithms are often specialized and complicated. In this paper, we propose a new DS paradigm--document-based distant supervision, which models relation extraction as a document-based machine reading comprehension (MRC) task. By re-organizing all sentences about an entity as a document and extracting relations via querying the document with relation-specific questions, the document-based DS paradigm can simultaneously encode and exploit all sentence-level, inter-sentence-level, and entity-level evidence. Furthermore, we design a new loss function--DSLoss (distant supervision loss), which can effectively train MRC models using only ⟨document, question, answer⟩ tuples, therefore noisy label problem can be inherently resolved. Experiments show that our method achieves new state-of-the-art DS performance.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship Extraction (Distant Supervised) | NYT | DocDS | P@100 | 0.939 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relationship Extraction (Distant Supervised) | NYT | DocDS | P@200 | 0.889 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relationship Extraction (Distant Supervised) | NYT | DocDS | P@300 | 0.873 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Relationship Extraction (Distant Supervised) | NYT | DocDS | PR AUC | 0.595 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections