Papers › Free water DTI estimates from single b-value data might seem plausible but must be...
Free water DTI estimates from single b-value data might seem plausible but must be interpreted with care
Marc Golub, Rafael Neto Henriques, Rita G. Nunes
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Purpose: Free water elimination diffusion tensor imaging (FWE-DTI) has been widely used to distinguish increases of free water (FW) partial volume effects from tissue's diffusion in healthy ageing and degenerative diseases. Since the FWE-DTI fitting is only well posed for multi-shell acquisitions, a regularized gradient descent (RGD) method was proposed to enable application to single-shell data, more common in the clinic. However, the validity of the RGD method has been poorly assessed. This study aims to quantify the specificity of FWE-DTI procedures on single- and multi-shell data. Methods: Different FWE-DTI fitting procedures were tested on an open-source in vivo diffusion dataset and single- and multi-shell synthetic signals, including the RGD and standard non-linear least squares (NLS) methods. Single-voxel simulations were carried out to compare initialization approaches. A multi-voxel phantom simulation was performed to evaluate the impact of spatial regularization when comparing between methods. To test the algorithms' specificity, phantoms with two different types of lesions were simulated: with increased mean diffusivity (MD) or with increased FW. Result: Plausible parameter maps were obtained with RGD from single-shell in vivo data. The plausibility of these maps was shown to be determined by the initialization. Tests with simulated lesions inserted into the in vivo data revealed that the RGD approach cannot distinguish FW from tissue MD alterations, contrarily to the NLS algorithm. Conclusion: RGD FWE-DTI has limited specificity and, thus, its results from single-shell data should be carefully interpreted. When possible, multi-shell acquisitions and the NLS approach should be preferred instead.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections