Papers › Fortuitous Forgetting in Connectionist Networks

Fortuitous Forgetting in Connectionist Networks

1 Feb 2022ICLR 2022 4arXiv:2202.00155archive 2025-07-28

Hattie Zhou, Ankit Vani, Hugo Larochelle, Aaron Courville

Forgetting is often seen as an unwanted characteristic in both human and machine learning. However, we propose that forgetting can in fact be favorable to learning. We introduce "forget-and-relearn" as a powerful paradigm for shaping the learning trajectories of artificial neural networks. In this process, the forgetting step selectively removes undesirable information from the model, and the relearning step reinforces features that are consistently useful under different conditions. The forget-and-relearn framework unifies many existing iterative training algorithms in the image classification and language emergence literature, and allows us to understand the success of these algorithms in terms of the disproportionate forgetting of undesirable information. We leverage this understanding to improve upon existing algorithms by designing more targeted forgetting operations. Insights from our analysis provide a coherent view on the dynamics of iterative training in neural networks and offer a clear path towards performance improvements.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2202.00155")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 6 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

hlml/fortuitous_forgetting officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 6 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · honoured contract
3ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from hlml/fortuitous_forgetting. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

convert_data_to_tensor hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/ease_of_teaching/forget_train.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · badd0c4bc44d8a29 · report
get_trainer hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/llf_ke/train_KE_cls.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 13e0b35909c0dfbc · report
load_datasets hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/targeted_forgetting/mixed_group_training.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · c3d99cad036fdd02 · report
save_weight_one_iter hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/ease_of_teaching/forget_train.py official repository ran · honoured contract no licence file found · pointer only · 47ff0bc895e6393d · report
test hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/targeted_forgetting/mixed_group_training.py official repository ran · honoured contract no licence file found · pointer only · be30a111de94186a · report
torch_bernoulli hlml/fortuitous_forgetting/targeted_forgetting/mixed_group_training.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · dfdc385882e7d348 · report

Tasks

Image Classificationimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections