Papers › Formalization of the Axiom of Choice and its Equivalent Theorems
Formalization of the Axiom of Choice and its Equivalent Theorems
Tianyu Sun, Wensheng Yu
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this paper, we describe the formalization of the axiom of choice and several of its famous equivalent theorems in Morse-Kelley set theory. These theorems include Tukey's lemma, the Hausdorff maximal principle, the maximal principle, Zermelo's postulate, Zorn's lemma and the well-ordering theorem. We prove the above theorems by the axiom of choice in turn, and finally prove the axiom of choice by Zermelo's postulate and the well-ordering theorem, thus completing the cyclic proof of equivalence between them. The proofs are checked formally using the Coq proof assistant in which Morse-Kelley set theory is formalized. The whole process of formal proof demonstrates that the Coq-based machine proving of mathematics theorem is highly reliable and rigorous. The formal work of this paper is enough for most applications, especially in set theory, topology and algebra.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections