Papers › Forgettable Federated Linear Learning with Certified Data Unlearning
Forgettable Federated Linear Learning with Certified Data Unlearning
Ruinan Jin, Minghui Chen, Qiong Zhang, Xiaoxiao Li
The advent of Federated Learning (FL) has revolutionized the way distributed systems handle collaborative model training while preserving user privacy. Recently, Federated Unlearning (FU) has emerged to address demands for the "right to be forgotten"" and unlearning of the impact of poisoned clients without requiring retraining in FL. Most FU algorithms require the cooperation of retained or target clients (clients to be unlearned), introducing additional communication overhead and potential security risks. In addition, some FU methods need to store historical models to execute the unlearning process. These challenges hinder the efficiency and memory constraints of the current FU methods. Moreover, due to the complexity of nonlinear models and their training strategies, most existing FU methods for deep neural networks (DNN) lack theoretical certification. In this work, we introduce a novel FL training and unlearning strategy in DNN, termed Forgettable Federated Linear Learning (F^2L^2). F^2L^2 considers a common practice of using pre-trained models to approximate DNN linearly, allowing them to achieve similar performance as the original networks via Federated Linear Training (FLT). We then present FedRemoval, a certified, efficient, and secure unlearning strategy that enables the server to unlearn a target client without requiring client communication or adding additional storage. We have conducted extensive empirical validation on small- to large-scale datasets, using both convolutional neural networks and modern foundation models. These experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of F^2L^2 in balancing model accuracy with the successful unlearning of target clients. F^2L^2 represents a promising pipeline for efficient and trustworthy FU. The code is available here.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2306.02216")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.
By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from nanboy-ronan/2f2l-federated-unlearning. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
81422d4b1ae55408 · report
1445690bd71e9390 · report
b7b5521fcda8eef2 · report
cbe6c75c518c4d16 · report
7c2d5d7cc36d18eb · report
0430f22efc51433d · report
f4cb7252eca0ab8e · report
60ccbdffb5bfac82 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections