Papers › Force Field Analysis Software and Tools (FFAST): Assessing Machine Learning Force...
Force Field Analysis Software and Tools (FFAST): Assessing Machine Learning Force Fields Under the Microscope
Gregory Fonseca, Igor Poltavsky, Alexandre Tkatchenko
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
As the sophistication of Machine Learning Force Fields (MLFF) increases to match the complexity of extended molecules and materials, so does the need for tools to properly analyze and assess the practical performance of MLFFs. To go beyond average error metrics and into a complete picture of a model's applicability and limitations, we develop FFAST (Force Field Analysis Software and Tools): a cross-platform software package designed to gain detailed insights into a model's performance and limitations, complete with an easy-to-use graphical user interface. The software allows the user to gauge the performance of many popular state-of-the-art MLFF models on various popular dataset types, providing general prediction error overviews, outlier detection mechanisms, atom-projected errors, and more. It has a 3D visualizer to find and picture problematic configurations, atoms, or clusters in a large dataset. In this paper, the example of the MACE and Nequip models are used on two datasets of interest -- stachyose and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) -- to illustrate the use cases of the software. With it, it was found that carbons and oxygens involved in or near glycosidic bonds inside the stachyose molecule present increased prediction errors. In addition, prediction errors on DHA rise as the molecule folds, especially for the carboxylic group at the edge of the molecule. We emphasize the need for a systematic assessment of MLFF models for ensuring their successful application to study the dynamics of molecules and materials.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections