Papers › FlowDNS: Correlating Netflow and DNS Streams at Scale
FlowDNS: Correlating Netflow and DNS Streams at Scale
Aniss Maghsoudlou, Oliver Gasser, Ingmar Poese, Anja Feldmann
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Knowing customer's interests, e.g. which Video-On-Demand (VoD) or Social Network services they are using, helps telecommunication companies with better network planning to enhance the performance exactly where the customer's interests lie, and also offer the customers relevant commercial packages. However, with the increasing deployment of CDNs by different services, identification, and attribution of the traffic on network-layer information alone becomes a challenge: If multiple services are using the same CDN provider, they cannot be easily distinguished based on IP prefixes alone. Therefore, it is crucial to go beyond pure network-layer information for traffic attribution. In this work, we leverage real-time DNS responses gathered by the clients' default DNS resolvers. Having these DNS responses and correlating them with network-layer headers, we are able to translate CDN-hosted domains to the actual services they belong to. We design a correlation system for this purpose and deploy it at a large European ISP. With our system, we can correlate an average of 81.7% of the traffic with the corresponding services, without any loss on our live data streams. Our correlation results also show that 0.5% of the daily traffic contains malformatted, spamming, or phishing domain names. Moreover, ISPs can correlate the results with their BGP information to find more details about the origin and destination of the traffic. We plan to publish our correlation software for other researchers or network operators to use.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections