Papers › Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth
Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth
Scott Kostyshak
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Critical bandwidth (CB) is used to test the multimodality of densities and regression functions, as well as for clustering methods. CB tests are known to be inconsistent if the function of interest is constant ("flat") over even a small interval, and to suffer from low power and incorrect size in finite samples if the function has a relatively small derivative over an interval. This paper proposes a solution, flatness-robust CB (FRCB), that exploits the novel observation that the inconsistency manifests only from regions consistent with the null hypothesis, and thus identifying and excluding them does not alter the null or alternative sets. I provide sufficient conditions for consistency of FRCB, and simulations of a test of regression monotonicity demonstrate the finite-sample properties of FRCB compared with CB for various regression functions. Surprisingly, FRCB performs better than CB in some cases where there are no flat regions, which can be explained by FRCB essentially giving more importance to parts of the function where there are larger violations of the null hypothesis. I illustrate the usefulness of FRCB with an empirical analysis of the monotonicity of the conditional mean function of radiocarbon age with respect to calendar age.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections