Papers › Fine-Tuning Language Models for Scientific Writing Support
Fine-Tuning Language Models for Scientific Writing Support
Justin Mücke, Daria Waldow, Luise Metzger, Philipp Schauz, Marcel Hoffman, Nicolas Lell, Ansgar Scherp
We support scientific writers in determining whether a written sentence is scientific, to which section it belongs, and suggest paraphrasings to improve the sentence. Firstly, we propose a regression model trained on a corpus of scientific sentences extracted from peer-reviewed scientific papers and non-scientific text to assign a score that indicates the scientificness of a sentence. We investigate the effect of equations and citations on this score to test the model for potential biases. Secondly, we create a mapping of section titles to a standard paper layout in AI and machine learning to classify a sentence to its most likely section. We study the impact of context, i.e., surrounding sentences, on the section classification performance. Finally, we propose a paraphraser, which suggests an alternative for a given sentence that includes word substitutions, additions to the sentence, and structural changes to improve the writing style. We train various large language models on sentences extracted from arXiv papers that were peer reviewed and published at A*, A, B, and C ranked conferences. On the scientificness task, all models achieve an MSE smaller than 2%. For the section classification, BERT outperforms WideMLP and SciBERT in most cases. We demonstrate that using context enhances the classification of a sentence, achieving up to a 90% F1-score. Although the paraphrasing models make comparatively few alterations, they produce output sentences close to the gold standard. Large fine-tuned models such as T5 Large perform best in experiments considering various measures of difference between input sentence and gold standard. Code is provided under https://github.com/JustinMuecke/SciSen.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections