Papers › Human Correspondence Consensus for 3D Object Semantic Understanding

Human Correspondence Consensus for 3D Object Semantic Understanding

29 Dec 2019ECCV 2020 8arXiv:1912.12577archive 2025-07-28

Yujing Lou, Yang You, Chengkun Li, Zhoujun Cheng, Liangwei Li, Lizhuang Ma, Weiming Wang, Cewu Lu

Semantic understanding of 3D objects is crucial in many applications such as object manipulation. However, it is hard to give a universal definition of point-level semantics that everyone would agree on. We observe that people have a consensus on semantic correspondences between two areas from different objects, but are less certain about the exact semantic meaning of each area. Therefore, we argue that by providing human labeled correspondences between different objects from the same category instead of explicit semantic labels, one can recover rich semantic information of an object. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset named CorresPondenceNet. Based on this dataset, we are able to learn dense semantic embeddings with a novel geodesic consistency loss. Accordingly, several state-of-the-art networks are evaluated on this correspondence benchmark. We further show that CorresPondenceNet could not only boost fine-grained understanding of heterogeneous objects but also cross-object registration and partial object matching.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

yokinglou/CorresPondenceNet officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

3D Feature Matching3D Point Cloud MatchingObject

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

CPNet

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections