Papers › Finding Statistically Significant Attribute Interactions

Finding Statistically Significant Attribute Interactions

22 Dec 2016arXiv:1612.07597archive 2025-07-28

Andreas Henelius, Antti Ukkonen, Kai Puolamäki

In many data exploration tasks it is meaningful to identify groups of attribute interactions that are specific to a variable of interest. For instance, in a dataset where the attributes are medical markers and the variable of interest (class variable) is binary indicating presence/absence of disease, we would like to know which medical markers interact with respect to the binary class label. These interactions are useful in several practical applications, for example, to gain insight into the structure of the data, in feature selection, and in data anonymisation. We present a novel method, based on statistical significance testing, that can be used to verify if the data set has been created by a given factorised class-conditional joint distribution, where the distribution is parametrised by a partition of its attributes. Furthermore, we provide a method, named ASTRID, for automatically finding a partition of attributes describing the distribution that has generated the data. State-of-the-art classifiers are utilised to capture the interactions present in the data by systematically breaking attribute interactions and observing the effect of this breaking on classifier performance. We empirically demonstrate the utility of the proposed method with examples using real and synthetic data.

PaperPDFCode

Code

bwrc/astrid-r officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Attributefeature selection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections