Papers › Finding Relevant Flood Images on Twitter using Content-based Filters

Finding Relevant Flood Images on Twitter using Content-based Filters

11 Nov 2020arXiv:2011.05756archive 2025-07-28

Björn Barz, Kai Schröter, Ann-Christin Kra, Joachim Denzler

The analysis of natural disasters such as floods in a timely manner often suffers from limited data due to coarsely distributed sensors or sensor failures. At the same time, a plethora of information is buried in an abundance of images of the event posted on social media platforms such as Twitter. These images could be used to document and rapidly assess the situation and derive proxy-data not available from sensors, e.g., the degree of water pollution. However, not all images posted online are suitable or informative enough for this purpose. Therefore, we propose an automatic filtering approach using machine learning techniques for finding Twitter images that are relevant for one of the following information objectives: assessing the flooded area, the inundation depth, and the degree of water pollution. Instead of relying on textual information present in the tweet, the filter analyzes the image contents directly. We evaluate the performance of two different approaches and various features on a case-study of two major flooding events. Our image-based filter is able to enhance the quality of the results substantially compared with a keyword-based filter, improving the mean average precision from 23% to 53% on average.

PaperPDFCode

Code

cvjena/twitter-flood-dataset officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Twitter Flood

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections