Papers › Find Any Part in 3D

Find Any Part in 3D

20 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.13550archive 2025-07-28

Ziqi Ma, Yisong Yue, Georgia Gkioxari

Why don't we have foundation models in 3D yet? A key limitation is data scarcity. For 3D object part segmentation, existing datasets are small in size and lack diversity. We show that it is possible to break this data barrier by building a data engine powered by 2D foundation models. Our data engine automatically annotates any number of object parts: 1755x more unique part types than existing datasets combined. By training on our annotated data with a simple contrastive objective, we obtain an open-world model that generalizes to any part in any object based on any text query. Even when evaluated zero-shot, we outperform existing methods on the datasets they train on. We achieve 260% improvement in mIoU and boost speed by 6x to 300x. Our scaling analysis confirms that this generalization stems from the data scale, which underscores the impact of our data engine. Finally, to advance general-category open-world 3D part segmentation, we release a benchmark covering a wide range of objects and parts. Project website: https://ziqi-ma.github.io/find3dsite/

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ziqi-ma/find3d. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections