Papers › Federated Learning via Consensus Mechanism on Heterogeneous Data: A New Perspective on...
Federated Learning via Consensus Mechanism on Heterogeneous Data: A New Perspective on Convergence
Shu Zheng, Tiandi Ye, Xiang Li, Ming Gao
Federated learning (FL) on heterogeneous data (non-IID data) has recently received great attention. Most existing methods focus on studying the convergence guarantees for the global objective. While these methods can guarantee the decrease of the global objective in each communication round, they fail to ensure risk decrease for each client. In this paper, to address the problem,we propose FedCOME, which introduces a consensus mechanism to enforce decreased risk for each client after each training round. In particular, we allow a slight adjustment to a client's gradient on the server side, which generates an acute angle between the corrected gradient and the original ones of other clients. We theoretically show that the consensus mechanism can guarantee the convergence of the global objective. To generalize the consensus mechanism to the partial participation FL scenario, we devise a novel client sampling strategy to select the most representative clients for the global data distribution. Training on these selected clients with the consensus mechanism could empirically lead to risk decrease for clients that are not selected. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets to show the superiority of FedCOME against other state-of-the-art methods in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and fairness. For reproducibility, we make our source code publicly available at: \url{https://github.com/fedcome/fedcome}.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections