Papers › A General Relationship between Optimality Criteria and Connectivity Indices for Active...

A General Relationship between Optimality Criteria and Connectivity Indices for Active Graph-SLAM

4 Oct 2021arXiv:2110.01289links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Julio A. Placed, José A. Castellanos

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Quantifying uncertainty is a key stage in active simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), as it allows to identify the most informative actions to execute. However, dealing with full covariance or even Fisher information matrices (FIMs) is computationally heavy and easily becomes intractable for online systems. In this work, we study the paradigm of active graph-SLAM formulated over \textit{SE(n)}, and propose a general relationship between the FIM of the system and the Laplacian matrix of the underlying pose-graph. This link makes possible to use graph connectivity indices as utility functions with optimality guarantees, since they approximate the well-known optimality criteria that stem from optimal design theory. Experimental validation demonstrates that the proposed method leads to equivalent decisions for active SLAM in a fraction of the time.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

julioplaced/active_graph_slam officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections