Papers › Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise

Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise

15 Jul 2020arXiv:2007.07901links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Robin Harper, Wenjun Yu, Steven T. Flammia

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

As quantum computers approach the fault tolerance threshold, diagnosing and characterizing the noise on large scale quantum devices is increasingly important. One of the most important classes of noise channels is the class of Pauli channels, for reasons of both theoretical tractability and experimental relevance. Here we present a practical algorithm for estimating the s nonzero Pauli error rates in an s-sparse, n-qubit Pauli noise channel, or more generally the s largest Pauli error rates. The algorithm comes with rigorous recovery guarantees and uses only O(n²) measurements, O(s n²) classical processing time, and Clifford quantum circuits. We experimentally validate a heuristic version of the algorithm that uses simplified Clifford circuits on data from an IBM 14-qubit superconducting device and our open source implementation. These data show that accurate and precise estimation of the probability of arbitrary-weight Pauli errors is possible even when the signal is two orders of magnitude below the measurement noise floor.

PaperPDFCode

Code

rharper2/sparsePauliReconstruction officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections