Papers › Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learning

Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learning

10 Feb 2019arXiv:1902.06673archive 2025-07-28

Federico Monti, Fabrizio Frasca, Davide Eynard, Damon Mannion, Michael M. Bronstein

Social media are nowadays one of the main news sources for millions of people around the globe due to their low cost, easy access and rapid dissemination. This however comes at the cost of dubious trustworthiness and significant risk of exposure to 'fake news', intentionally written to mislead the readers. Automatically detecting fake news poses challenges that defy existing content-based analysis approaches. One of the main reasons is that often the interpretation of the news requires the knowledge of political or social context or 'common sense', which current NLP algorithms are still missing. Recent studies have shown that fake and real news spread differently on social media, forming propagation patterns that could be harnessed for the automatic fake news detection. Propagation-based approaches have multiple advantages compared to their content-based counterparts, among which is language independence and better resilience to adversarial attacks. In this paper we show a novel automatic fake news detection model based on geometric deep learning. The underlying core algorithms are a generalization of classical CNNs to graphs, allowing the fusion of heterogeneous data such as content, user profile and activity, social graph, and news propagation. Our model was trained and tested on news stories, verified by professional fact-checking organizations, that were spread on Twitter. Our experiments indicate that social network structure and propagation are important features allowing highly accurate (92.7% ROC AUC) fake news detection. Second, we observe that fake news can be reliably detected at an early stage, after just a few hours of propagation. Third, we test the aging of our model on training and testing data separated in time. Our results point to the promise of propagation-based approaches for fake news detection as an alternative or complementary strategy to content-based approaches.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1902.06673")

Code

Syntology Ran 10 of 12 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 8 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 11 samples from 2 repositories, 9 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

YingtongDou/GCNN mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
gordicaleksa/pytorch-GAT mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
npurg/faknow mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
safe-graph/GNN-FakeNews mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

12 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
8ran
2unverified

Licence: 1 of the 12 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

cal_length npurg/faknow/faknow/model/content_based/m3fend.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 1f9e3635ea437a43 · report
calculate_accuracy npurg/faknow/faknow/evaluate/metrics.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 3d7ef288ba2728b6 · report
conv2d_bn_relu npurg/faknow/faknow/model/layers/dct.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 99c62a2efeaa598a · report
get_metric_func npurg/faknow/faknow/evaluate/metrics.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 30876570035a9feb · report
masked_softmax npurg/faknow/faknow/model/layers/transformer.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · d585b0b52e8e6a84 · report
norm npurg/faknow/faknow/model/content_based/m3fend.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 260cf2039211af77 · report
sequence_mask npurg/faknow/faknow/model/layers/transformer.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 62c7cc7bf1f04934 · report
to_GBs gordicaleksa/pytorch-GAT/playground.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 364e76fb256f12f4 · report
transpose_qkv npurg/faknow/faknow/model/layers/transformer.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 9fe1fb5979d44c4d · report
calculate_precision npurg/faknow/faknow/evaluate/metrics.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 811f77b9f94fc00d · report
convert_to_onehot npurg/faknow/faknow/model/content_based/m3fend.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 2f32d51fc968cd31 · report
split identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · fixture could not drive it licence of this copy not recorded · fa145afc46ed4a2d · report

Tasks

Common Sense ReasoningDeep LearningFact CheckingFake News DetectionGraph Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: GCNFN

GCNFN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections