Papers › Fake it till you make it: using artificial turbulence to achieve swift converged...
Fake it till you make it: using artificial turbulence to achieve swift converged turbulence statistics in a pressure-driven channel flow
Akshay Patil, Clara García-Sánchez
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this study, we introduced a simple yet innovative method to trigger turbulence in a channel flow to achieve statistically stationary flow conditions. We compare this new method based on synthetically generated three-dimensional turbulence with two other well-established methods, namely, linear profile superposed with random noise and descending counter-rotating vortices and log-law profile superposed with random noise and descending counter-rotating vortices. We found that synthetically generated three-dimensional turbulence provides a computationally cheap and effective way to reduce simulation spin-up to achieve statistically stationary flow conditions when a precursor turbulent initial condition is not available. At a one-time cost of less than 1 CPU hour to generate the synthetic turbulent initial condition, the flow becomes statistically stationary within 3 eddy turnovers for all the parameters of interest in wall-bounded pressure-driven channel flow simulations when compared to other alternatives that can take more than 10 eddy turnovers resulting in substantial savings in the computational cost.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections