Papers › FaiRR: Faithful and Robust Deductive Reasoning over Natural Language

FaiRR: Faithful and Robust Deductive Reasoning over Natural Language

19 Mar 2022ACL 2022 5arXiv:2203.10261archive 2025-07-28

Soumya Sanyal, Harman Singh, Xiang Ren

Transformers have been shown to be able to perform deductive reasoning on a logical rulebase containing rules and statements written in natural language. Recent works show that such models can also produce the reasoning steps (i.e., the proof graph) that emulate the model's logical reasoning process. Currently, these black-box models generate both the proof graph and intermediate inferences within the same model and thus may be unfaithful. In this work, we frame the deductive logical reasoning task by defining three modular components: rule selection, fact selection, and knowledge composition. The rule and fact selection steps select the candidate rule and facts to be used and then the knowledge composition combines them to generate new inferences. This ensures model faithfulness by assured causal relation from the proof step to the inference reasoning. To test our framework, we propose FaiRR (Faithful and Robust Reasoner) where the above three components are independently modeled by transformers. We observe that FaiRR is robust to novel language perturbations, and is faster at inference than previous works on existing reasoning datasets. Additionally, in contrast to black-box generative models, the errors made by FaiRR are more interpretable due to the modular approach.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2203.10261")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ink-usc/fairr officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran
8unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from INK-USC/FaiRR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_proof_graph INK-USC/FaiRR/pw_helper.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · c13d0749a5472646 · report
generate_proof INK-USC/FaiRR/proof_inference.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · acb5d67c498916e4 · report
get_out_fname INK-USC/FaiRR/process_proofwriter.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 5b93abe97f863f44 · report
get_pw_fname INK-USC/FaiRR/process_proofwriter.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 3e7f33019c4d669c · report
get_pw_subdir INK-USC/FaiRR/process_proofwriter.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 0d99b520cf1b8a9e · report
get_verb INK-USC/FaiRR/proof_inference.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 3ec8128c84eac6fa · report
negate INK-USC/FaiRR/proof_inference.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · e3feb54ff6e72cfe · report
parse_all_questions INK-USC/FaiRR/pw_helper.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 28a533581e0c4cfe · report
parse_proof_inference_unstaged INK-USC/FaiRR/pw_helper.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 46ffcd272c3bb67a · report

Tasks

Fact SelectionLogical Reasoning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections