Papers › Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics
Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics
Leonardo Iurada, Silvia Bucci, Timothy M. Hospedales, Tatiana Tommasi
Deep learning-based recognition systems are deployed at scale for several real-world applications that inevitably involve our social life. Although being of great support when making complex decisions, they might capture spurious data correlations and leverage sensitive attributes (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity). How to factor out this information while keeping a high prediction performance is a task with still several open questions, many of which are shared with those of the domain adaptation and generalization literature which focuses on avoiding visual domain biases. In this work, we propose an in-depth study of the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness by introducing a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks. After having highlighted the limits of the current evaluation metrics, we introduce a new Harmonic Fairness (HF) score to assess jointly how fair and accurate every model is with respect to a reference baseline. Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter. Overall, our work paves the way for a more systematic analysis of fairness problems in computer vision. Code available at: https://github.com/iurada/fairness_crossdomain
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections