Papers › FADO: Floorplan-Aware Directive Optimization for High-Level Synthesis Designs on...
FADO: Floorplan-Aware Directive Optimization for High-Level Synthesis Designs on Multi-Die FPGAs
Linfeng Du, Tingyuan Liang, Sharad Sinha, Zhiyao Xie, Wei Zhang
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Multi-die FPGAs are widely adopted to deploy large hardware accelerators. Two factors impede the performance optimization of HLS designs implemented on multi-die FPGAs. On the one hand, the long net delay due to nets crossing die-boundaries results in an NP-hard problem to properly floorplan and pipeline an application. On the other hand, traditional automated searching flow for HLS directive optimizations targets single-die FPGAs, and hence, it cannot consider the resource constraints on each die and the timing issue incurred by the die-crossings. Further, it leads to an excessively long runtime to legalize the floorplan of HLS designs generated under each group of configurations during directive optimization due to the large design scale. To co-optimize the directives and floorplan of HLS designs on multi-die FPGAs, we propose the FADO framework, which formulates the directive-floorplan co-search problem based on the multi-choice multi-dimensional bin-packing and solves it using an iterative optimization flow. For each step of directive search, a latency-bottleneck-guided greedy algorithm searches for more efficient directive configurations. For floorplanning, instead of repetitively incurring global floorplanning algorithms, we implement a more efficient incremental floorplan legalization algorithm. It mainly applies the worst-fit online bin-packing algorithm to balance the floorplan, together with an offline best-fit-decreasing re-packing to compact the floorplan, followed by pipelining of long wires crossing die-boundaries. Through experiments on HLS designs mixing dataflow and non-dataflow kernels, FADO not only well-automates the co-optimization and finishes within 693X~4925X shorter runtime, compared with DSE assisted by global floorplanning, but also yields an improvement of 1.16X~8.78X in overall workflow execution time after implementation on the Xilinx Alveo U250 FPGA.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections