Papers › Face Recognition In Children: A Longitudinal Study

Face Recognition In Children: A Longitudinal Study

4 Apr 2022arXiv:2204.01760archive 2025-07-28

Keivan Bahmani, Stephanie Schuckers

The lack of high fidelity and publicly available longitudinal children face datasets is one of the main limiting factors in the development of face recognition systems for children. In this work, we introduce the Young Face Aging (YFA) dataset for analyzing the performance of face recognition systems over short age-gaps in children. We expand previous work by comparing YFA with several publicly available cross-age adult datasets to quantify the effects of short age-gap in adults and children. Our analysis confirms a statistically significant and matcher independent decaying relationship between the match scores of ArcFace-Focal, MagFace, and Facenet matchers and the age-gap between the gallery and probe images in children, even at the short age-gap of 6 months. However, our result indicates that the low verification performance reported in previous work might be due to the intra-class structure of the matcher and the lower quality of the samples. Our experiment using YFA and a state-of-the-art, quality-aware face matcher (MagFace) indicates 98.3% and 94.9% TAR at 0.1% FAR over 6 and 36 Months age-gaps, respectively, suggesting that face recognition may be feasible for children for age-gaps of up to three years.

PaperPDFCode

Code

keivanB/Young_Face_Aging_YFA officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Face RecognitionTAR

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

MagFace

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections