Papers › Extreme Learning Machine design for dealing with unrepresentative features

Extreme Learning Machine design for dealing with unrepresentative features

4 Dec 2019arXiv:1912.02154archive 2025-07-28

Nicolás Nieto, Francisco Ibarrola, Victoria Peterson, Hugo Rufiner, Ruben Spies

Extreme Learning Machines (ELMs) have become a popular tool in the field of Artificial Intelligence due to their very high training speed and generalization capabilities. Another advantage is that they have a single hyper-parameter that must be tuned up: the number of hidden nodes. Most traditional approaches dictate that this parameter should be chosen smaller than the number of available training samples in order to avoid over-fitting. In fact, it has been proved that choosing the number of hidden nodes equal to the number of training samples yields a perfect training classification with probability 1 (w.r.t. the random parameter initialization). In this article we argue that in spite of this, in some cases it may be beneficial to choose a much larger number of hidden nodes, depending on certain properties of the data. We explain why this happens and show some examples to illustrate how the model behaves. In addition, we present a pruning algorithm to cope with the additional computational burden associated to the enlarged ELM. Experimental results using electroencephalography (EEG) signals show an improvement in performance with respect to traditional ELM approaches, while diminishing the extra computing time associated to the use of large architectures.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

EEGElectroencephalogram (EEG)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

PruningSPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections