Papers › External photoevaporation of circumstellar disks constrains the timescale for planet formation
External photoevaporation of circumstellar disks constrains the timescale for planet formation
Francisca Concha-Ramírez, Maite J. C. Wilhelm, Simon Portegies Zwart, Thomas J. Haworth
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Planet-forming circumstellar disks are a fundamental part of the star formation process. Since stars form in a hierarchical fashion in groups of up to hundreds or thousands, the UV radiation environment that these disks are exposed to can vary in strength by at least six orders of magnitude. This radiation can limit the masses and sizes of the disks. Diversity in star forming environments can have long lasting effects in disk evolution and in the resulting planetary populations. We perform simulations to explore the evolution of circumstellar disks in young star clusters. We include viscous evolution, as well as the impact of dynamical encounters and external photoevaporation. We find that photoevaporation is an important process in destroying circumstellar disks: in regions of stellar density ρ∼100 M_⊙ pc⁻³ around 80% of disks are destroyed before 2 Myr of cluster evolution. Our findings are in agreement with observed disk fractions in young star forming regions and support previous estimations that planet formation must start in timescales < 0.1 - 1 Myr.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections