Papers › Extending Pretrained Segmentation Networks with Additional Anatomical Structures

Extending Pretrained Segmentation Networks with Additional Anatomical Structures

12 Nov 2018arXiv:1811.04634archive 2025-07-28

Firat Ozdemir, Orcun Goksel

Comprehensive surgical planning require complex patient-specific anatomical models. For instance, functional muskuloskeletal simulations necessitate all relevant structures to be segmented, which could be performed in real-time using deep neural networks given sufficient annotated samples. Such large datasets of multiple structure annotations are costly to procure and are often unavailable in practice. Nevertheless, annotations from different studies and centers can be readily available, or become available in the future in an incremental fashion. We propose a class-incremental segmentation framework for extending a deep network trained for some anatomical structure to yet another structure using a small incremental annotation set. Through distilling knowledge from the current state of the framework, we bypass the need for a full retraining. This is a meta-method to extend any choice of desired deep segmentation network with only a minor addition per structure, which makes it suitable for lifelong class-incremental learning and applicable also for future deep neural network architectures. We evaluated our methods on a public knee dataset of 100 MR volumes. Through varying amount of incremental annotation ratios, we show how our proposed method can retain the previous anatomical structure segmentation performance superior to the conventional finetuning approach. In addition, our framework inherently exploits transferable knowledge from previously trained structures to incremental tasks, demonstrated by superior results compared to non-incremental training. With the presented method, new anatomical structures can be learned without catastrophic forgetting of older structures and without extensive increase of memory and complexity.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1811.04634")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

firatozdemir/LwfSeg-AeiSeg officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from firatozdemir/LwfSeg-AeiSeg. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

exp_name firatozdemir/LwfSeg-AeiSeg/inc_train.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · ebcf0343cf7016c7 · report

Tasks

Class Incremental LearningIncremental LearningSegmentationclass-incremental learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections