Papers › Extending and Analyzing Self-Supervised Learning Across Domains

Extending and Analyzing Self-Supervised Learning Across Domains

24 Apr 2020ECCV 2020 8arXiv:2004.11992archive 2025-07-28

Bram Wallace, Bharath Hariharan

Self-supervised representation learning has achieved impressive results in recent years, with experiments primarily coming on ImageNet or other similarly large internet imagery datasets. There has been little to no work with these methods on other smaller domains, such as satellite, textural, or biological imagery. We experiment with several popular methods on an unprecedented variety of domains. We discover, among other findings, that Rotation is by far the most semantically meaningful task, with much of the performance of Jigsaw and Instance Discrimination being attributable to the nature of their induced distribution rather than semantic understanding. Additionally, there are several areas, such as fine-grain classification, where all tasks underperform. We quantitatively and qualitatively diagnose the reasons for these failures and successes via novel experiments studying pretext generalization, random labelings, and implicit dimensionality. Code and models are available at https://github.com/BramSW/Extending_SSRL_Across_Domains/.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

BramSW/Extending_SSRL_Across_Domains officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Representation LearningSelf-Supervised Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Jigsaw

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections