Papers › Expressive power of complex-valued restricted Boltzmann machines for solving...
Expressive power of complex-valued restricted Boltzmann machines for solving non-stoquastic Hamiltonians
Chae-Yeun Park, Michael J. Kastoryano
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Variational Monte Carlo with neural network quantum states has proven to be a promising avenue for evaluating the ground state energy of spin Hamiltonians. However, despite continuous efforts the performance of the method on frustrated Hamiltonians remains significantly worse than those on stoquastic Hamiltonians that are sign-free. We present a detailed and systematic study of restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) based variational Monte Carlo for quantum spin chains, resolving how relevant stoquasticity is in this setting. We show that in most cases, when the Hamiltonian is phase connected with a stoquastic point, the complex RBM state can faithfully represent the ground state, and local quantities can be evaluated efficiently by sampling. On the other hand, we identify several new phases that are challenging for the RBM Ansatz, including non-topological robust non-stoquastic phases as well as stoquastic phases where sampling is nevertheless inefficient. Furthermore, we find that an accurate neural network representation of ground states in non-stoquastic phases is hindered not only by the sign structure but also by their amplitudes.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections