Papers › Exploring the Efficacy of Statistical and Deep Learning Methods for Large Spatial...

Exploring the Efficacy of Statistical and Deep Learning Methods for Large Spatial Datasets: A Case Study

10 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.05812links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Arnab Hazra, Pratik Nag, Rishikesh Yadav, Ying Sun

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Increasingly large and complex spatial datasets pose massive inferential challenges due to high computational and storage costs. Our study is motivated by the KAUST Competition on Large Spatial Datasets 2023, which tasked participants with estimating spatial covariance-related parameters and predicting values at testing sites, along with uncertainty estimates. We compared various statistical and deep learning approaches through cross-validation and ultimately selected the Vecchia approximation technique for model fitting. To overcome the constraints in the R package GpGp, which lacked support for fitting zero-mean Gaussian processes and direct uncertainty estimation-two things that are necessary for the competition, we developed additional \texttt{R} functions. Besides, we implemented certain subsampling-based approximations and parametric smoothing for skewed sampling distributions of the estimators. Our team DesiBoys secured victory in two out of four sub-competitions, validating the effectiveness of our proposed strategies. Moreover, we extended our evaluation to a large real spatial satellite-derived dataset on total precipitable water, where we compared the predictive performances of different models using multiple diagnostics.

PaperPDFCode

Code

pratik187/casestudy_spatial officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections