Papers › Exploring the Effectiveness of Multi-stage Fine-tuning for Cross-encoder Re-rankers

Exploring the Effectiveness of Multi-stage Fine-tuning for Cross-encoder Re-rankers

28 Mar 2025arXiv:2503.22672archive 2025-07-28

Francesca Pezzuti, Sean MacAvaney, Nicola Tonellotto

State-of-the-art cross-encoders can be fine-tuned to be highly effective in passage re-ranking. The typical fine-tuning process of cross-encoders as re-rankers requires large amounts of manually labelled data, a contrastive learning objective, and a set of heuristically sampled negatives. An alternative recent approach for fine-tuning instead involves teaching the model to mimic the rankings of a highly effective large language model using a distillation objective. These fine-tuning strategies can be applied either individually, or in sequence. In this work, we systematically investigate the effectiveness of point-wise cross-encoders when fine-tuned independently in a single stage, or sequentially in two stages. Our experiments show that the effectiveness of point-wise cross-encoders fine-tuned using contrastive learning is indeed on par with that of models fine-tuned with multi-stage approaches. Code is available for reproduction at https://github.com/fpezzuti/multistage-finetuning.

PaperPDFCode

Code

fpezzuti/multistage-finetuning officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Contrastive LearningLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelPassage Re-RankingRe-Ranking

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Contrastive LearningSET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections