Papers › Exploring Learning Rate Selection in Generalised Bayesian Inference using Posterior...

Exploring Learning Rate Selection in Generalised Bayesian Inference using Posterior Predictive Checks

2 Oct 2024arXiv:2410.01475links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Schyan Zafar, Geoff K. Nicholls

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Generalised Bayesian Inference (GBI) attempts to address model misspecification in a standard Bayesian setup by tempering the likelihood. The likelihood is raised to a fractional power, called the learning rate, which reduces its importance in the posterior and has been established as a method to address certain kinds of model misspecification. Posterior Predictive Checks (PPC) attempt to detect model misspecification by locating a diagnostic, computed on the observed data, within the posterior predictive distribution of the diagnostic. This can be used to construct a hypothesis test where a small p-value indicates potential misfit. The recent Embedded Diachronic Sense Change (EDiSC) model suffers from misspecification and benefits from likelihood tempering. Using EDiSC as a case study, this exploratory work examines whether PPC could be used in a novel way to set the learning rate in a GBI setup. Specifically, the learning rate selected is the lowest value for which a hypothesis test using the log likelihood diagnostic is not rejected at the 10% level. The experimental results are promising, though not definitive, and indicate the need for further research along the lines suggested here.

PaperPDFCode

Code

schyanzafar/GBI officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections