Papers › Exploring Joint Neural Model for Sentence Level Discourse Parsing and Sentiment Analysis

Exploring Joint Neural Model for Sentence Level Discourse Parsing and Sentiment Analysis

1 Aug 2017WS 2017 8archive 2025-07-28

Bita Nejat, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond Ng

Discourse Parsing and Sentiment Analysis are two fundamental tasks in Natural Language Processing that have been shown to be mutually beneficial. In this work, we design and compare two Neural Based models for jointly learning both tasks. In the proposed approach, we first create a vector representation for all the text segments in the input sentence. Next, we apply three different Recursive Neural Net models: one for discourse structure prediction, one for discourse relation prediction and one for sentiment analysis. Finally, we combine these Neural Nets in two different joint models: Multi-tasking and Pre-training. Our results on two standard corpora indicate that both methods result in improvements in each task but Multi-tasking has a bigger impact than Pre-training. Specifically for Discourse Parsing, we see improvements in the prediction of the set of contrastive relations.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Discourse ParsingPredictionRelation PredictionSentenceSentiment Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Sentiment Analysis SST-2 Binary classification Joined Model Multi-tasking Accuracy 54.72 #83 of 87 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SST-5 Fine-grained classification Joined Model Multi-tasking Accuracy 44.82 #26 of 31 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections