Papers › Exploring Foveation and Saccade for Improved Weakly-Supervised Localization
Exploring Foveation and Saccade for Improved Weakly-Supervised Localization
Timur Ibrayev, Manish Nagaraj, Amitangshu Mukherjee, Kaushik Roy
Deep neural networks have become the de facto choice as feature extraction engines, ubiquitously used for computer vision tasks. The current approach is to process every input with uniform resolution in a one-shot manner and make all of the predictions at once. However, human vision is an “active” process that not only actively switches from one focus point to another within the visual field, but also applies spatially varying attention centered at such focus points. To bridge the gap, we propose incorporating the bio-plausible mechanisms of foveation and saccades to build an active object localization framework. While foveation enables it to process different regions of the input with variable degrees of detail, saccades allow it to change the focus point of such foveated regions. Our experiments show that these mechanisms improve the quality of predicted bounding boxes by capturing all the essential object parts while minimizing unnecessary background clutter. Additionally, they enable the resiliency of the method by allowing it to detect multiple objects while being trained only on data containing a single object per image. Finally, we explore the alignment of our method with human perception using the interesting “duck-rabbit” optical illusion. The code is available at: https://github.com/TimurIbrayev/FALcon.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | CUB-200-2011 | FALcon | GT-known localization accuracy | 88.30 | #1 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | CUB-200-2011 | FALcon | Top-1 Localization Accuracy | 62.82 | #1 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | ImageNet | FALcon | GT-known localization accuracy | 62.45 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | ImageNet | FALcon | Top-1 Localization Accuracy | 49.39 | #5 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections