Papers › Exploring and Mitigating Gender Bias in Recommender Systems with Explicit Feedback
Exploring and Mitigating Gender Bias in Recommender Systems with Explicit Feedback
Shrikant Saxena, Shweta Jain
Recommender systems are indispensable because they influence our day-to-day behavior and decisions by giving us personalized suggestions. Services like Kindle, Youtube, and Netflix depend heavily on the performance of their recommender systems to ensure that their users have a good experience and to increase revenues. Despite their popularity, it has been shown that recommender systems reproduce and amplify the bias present in the real world. The resulting feedback creates a self-perpetuating loop that deteriorates the user experience and results in homogenizing recommendations over time. Further, biased recommendations can also reinforce stereotypes based on gender or ethnicity, thus reinforcing the filter bubbles that we live in. In this paper, we address the problem of gender bias in recommender systems with explicit feedback. We propose a model to quantify the gender bias present in book rating datasets and in the recommendations produced by the recommender systems. Our main contribution is to provide a principled approach to mitigate the bias being produced in the recommendations. We theoretically show that the proposed approach provides unbiased recommendations despite biased data. Through empirical evaluation on publicly available book rating datasets, we further show that the proposed model can significantly reduce bias without significant impact on accuracy. Our method is model agnostic and can be applied to any recommender system. To demonstrate the performance of our model, we present the results on four recommender algorithms, two from the K-nearest neighbors family, UserKNN and ItemKNN, and the other two from the matrix factorization family, Alternating least square and Singular value decomposition.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2112.02530")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract.
By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from venomnomnom/genderbias. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
255cd4241d5377f4 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections