Papers › Exploration vs Convergence Speed in Adaptive-bias Enhanced Sampling

Exploration vs Convergence Speed in Adaptive-bias Enhanced Sampling

24 Jan 2022arXiv:2201.09950links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Michele Invernizzi, Michele Parrinello

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In adaptive-bias enhanced sampling methods, a bias potential is added to the system to drive transitions between metastable states. The bias potential is a function of a few collective variables and is gradually modified according to the underlying free energy surface. We show that when the collective variables are suboptimal, there is an exploration-convergence tradeoff, and one must choose between a quickly converging bias that will lead to fewer transitions, or a slower to converge bias that can explore the phase space more efficiently but might require a much longer time to produce an accurate free energy estimate. The recently proposed On-the-fly Probability Enhanced Sampling (OPES) method focuses on fast convergence, but there are cases where fast exploration is preferred instead. For this reason, we introduce a new variant of the OPES method that focuses on quickly escaping metastable states, at the expense of convergence speed. We illustrate the benefits of this approach on prototypical systems and show that it outperforms the popular metadynamics method.

PaperPDFCode

Code

invemichele/OPES-explore officialmentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections