Papers › Explicit Estimation of Magnitude and Phase Spectra in Parallel for High-Quality Speech...
Explicit Estimation of Magnitude and Phase Spectra in Parallel for High-Quality Speech Enhancement
Ye-Xin Lu, Yang Ai, Zhen-Hua Ling
Phase information has a significant impact on speech perceptual quality and intelligibility. However, existing speech enhancement methods encounter limitations in explicit phase estimation due to the non-structural nature and wrapping characteristics of the phase, leading to a bottleneck in enhanced speech quality. To overcome the above issue, in this paper, we proposed MP-SENet, a novel Speech Enhancement Network that explicitly enhances Magnitude and Phase spectra in parallel. The proposed MP-SENet comprises a Transformer-embedded encoder-decoder architecture. The encoder aims to encode the input distorted magnitude and phase spectra into time-frequency representations, which are further fed into time-frequency Transformers for alternatively capturing time and frequency dependencies. The decoder comprises a magnitude mask decoder and a phase decoder, directly enhancing magnitude and wrapped phase spectra by incorporating a magnitude masking architecture and a phase parallel estimation architecture, respectively. Multi-level loss functions explicitly defined on the magnitude spectra, wrapped phase spectra, and short-time complex spectra are adopted to jointly train the MP-SENet model. A metric discriminator is further employed to compensate for the incomplete correlation between these losses and human auditory perception. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed MP-SENet achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple speech enhancement tasks, including speech denoising, dereverberation, and bandwidth extension. Compared to existing phase-aware speech enhancement methods, it further mitigates the compensation effect between the magnitude and phase by explicit phase estimation, elevating the perceptual quality of enhanced speech.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.08926")
Code
Syntology Ran 13 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 14 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
14 samples harvested; 13 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from yxlu-0102/MP-SENet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
1644a2f2942ffe4c · report
d62ed59ff4c8e24b · report
c8e0c267926f67c8 · report
a26f85d7c72ef39a · report
4d00da8ae6eb3bed · report
7e2312430b61853a · report
adf3c93b360b1cbf · report
ef7bc5d004029146 · report
3ab2f3d7f6b6899d · report
fea9c37e82071835 · report
404632cb4f4669da · report
f0e76e5a8f1370c1 · report
a3b64b4cf555f96f · report
f4486919199f4a94 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech Enhancement | Deep Noise Suppression (DNS) Challenge | MP-SENet | PESQ-NB | 3.92 | #5 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | Deep Noise Suppression (DNS) Challenge | MP-SENet | PESQ-WB | 3.62 | #5 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | Deep Noise Suppression (DNS) Challenge | MP-SENet | SI-SDR-WB | 21.03 | #5 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | CBAK | 3.99 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | COVL | 4.34 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | CSIG | 4.81 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | PESQ (wb) | 3.60 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | Para. (M) | 2.26 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | MP-SENet | STOI | 0.96 | #9 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections